No on Prop 15 Campaign Issues Election Night Statement

SACRAMENTO, CA – Michael Bustamante, spokesperson for the No on Prop 15 Campaign issued the following statement in response to the Proposition 15 Election Night results:

“Thanks to what is expected to be near-historic turnout, we anticipated that we would not know the outcome of Prop 15 on Election Night. No on Prop 15 has held a slight lead all night and we continue to be optimistic that growing opposition to Prop 15 seen in recent polls will ultimately drive us to victory when all of the votes are counted.”

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.

All Californians Will See Higher Food Prices Unless Prop 15 is Defeated

‘Farm to Fork’ Community Highlights How Largest Property Tax Increase in California History Will Hurt Consumers at Worst Possible Time 

SACRAMENTO, CA – Putting to rest any notion that Prop 15 protects farmers and ranchers, representatives from multiple steps along the food distribution process – literally from farm to fork – held a socially-distanced event today at a Sacramento farm, highlighting how Californians’ favorite food products will cost more unless Prop 15, the state’s largest ever property tax increase, is defeated. Participants gathered in person to explain to California voters how Prop 15’s proponents are knowingly providing false information about agricultural products. Ultimately, Prop 15’s agricultural flaw will lead hard-working Californians, most of whom are struggling from the worst economic crisis in a generation, to incur higher costs for food and other essentials.

“It’s clear that Prop 15’s authors went out of their way to deceive voters about the tax hike’s impact on farmers and ranchers,” said Shannon Douglass, a Glenn County farmer and First Vice President of the California Farm Bureau Federation. “While agricultural land isn’t taxed, every structure on that land is – barns, processing plants, mature fruit and nut trees and grape vines. Everything from farm to table will cost more money if Prop 15 passes, ultimately driving up the costs we pay to buy California-grown products.”

“Prop 15 will destroy Prop 13 and hurt our state’s farmers at a time when the nation relies on California – grown food now more than ever,” stated Greg Van Dyke, owner of VA Farms Trucking, a distributor of rice, stone fruit, and other commodities in Northern California, and founding president of Cultivating Change Foundation, the largest LGBT-agriculture organization in the United States. “As a fifth-generation farmer deeply committed to sustainability and feeding our state, I urge all Californians to say no to the flawed property increase ballot measure this November.”

While Prop 15 exempts agricultural land, it fails to protect the fixtures and improvements on that land that make farming possible. This flaw will impact families in a major way because Prop 15’s higher property taxes will hit a product multiple times as it moves from the field to the processing center to the distributor and finally to the grocery store or restaurant.

“As the assessor for the largest farming county in the United States, I know a thing or two about how property taxes are applied. Prop 15 will lead to family farms paying higher property taxes that customers will ultimately pay. There is no controversy about the fact that Prop 15 will significantly raise taxes on farmers and ranchers’ property,” added Paul Dictos, assessor for Fresno County.

According to research from USC, more than 1 in 4 Los Angeles County households experienced food insecurity this spring with women, low-income families and Latinos most impacted. Prop 15’s negative impact on the cost of living and higher costs for food will exacerbate an already bad situation for millions of families struggling to make ends meet.

“There could not be a worse time to raise property taxes on farmers and make food more expensive to deliver to communities across the state. Prop 15’s devastating cost of living increases will harm vulnerable communities the most,” concluded Michael Kelley, an almond huller and processor who also serves as President/CEO of the Central California Almond Growers Association. “California’s farming community is proud to be part of the food desert solution, but Prop 15 will threaten access to fresh and healthy California-grown products for communities and families already struggling to make ends meet.”

“At today’s press conference, we heard from the farmer who grows the food, the processor who gets it ready to go to market, the person who transports it and now me who serves it to you – the consumer,” added Patrick Mulvaney, chef/owner of Mulvaney’s B&L in Sacramento. “Prop 15’s taxes don’t start with me – it starts with the farmer or the rancher – and it will ultimately work its way down to my restaurant and your kitchen table.”

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.

NO ON PROP 15 CAMPAIGN RESPONDS TO LATEST PPIC POLL SHOWING CONTINUED DECLINE IN SUPPORT FOR THE LARGEST PROPERTY TAX HIKE IN CALIFORNIA HISTORY

SACRAMENTO, CA – The Public Policy Institute of California released its fourth poll on Proposition 15, which showed support for Prop 15 continuing to decline, dropping below the 50% vote threshold. The latest results represent a 2% decline in voter support and a significant 5% increase in voter opposition to the property tax increase from September’s PPIC poll.

“The PPIC’s latest poll, which shows a continued drop in support, validates what the No on Prop 15 campaign has said for months: the more voters learn that Prop 15 is the largest property tax hike in California history, will adversely impact farmers and small businesses, and is the first step by Prop 15 supporters to undo Prop 13’s protections for homeowners, the more voters are inclined to reject Prop 15,” said Michael Bustamante, spokesperson for the No on Prop 15 campaign.

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.

ICYMI: California Cattlemen’s Association: “Fewer choices, higher prices are headed your way unless Prop. 15 is defeated”

SACRAMENTO, CA – Mark Lacy, president of the California Cattlemen’s Association, penned an opinion piece in the San Joaquin Valley Sun opposing Proposition 15, the largest property tax increase in California history. Lacy cited concerns that the $11.5 billion-a-year property tax measure will devastate family-owned ranches and ultimately lead to higher prices for meat, cheese, eggs and produce for California families.

Read excerpts from “Fewer choices, higher prices are headed your way unless Prop. 15 is defeated” published in the San Joaquin Valley Sun below: 

Grocery bills will get more expensive, the cost of living will rise, ranchers will go out of business and our state’s economic recovery will move at a glacial pace.

“These would be just some of Proposition 15’s devastating impacts. As a rancher, I urge California voters to reject Prop 15 in November.

“Otherwise, every Californian will pay for the largest property tax increase in California history, even as we deal with COVID-19 and an unprecedented economic crisis.

“Ranches in California are family businesses. Ranches across the state are currently tended by fifth- or sixth-generation ranchers carrying on the family tradition of providing responsibly-raised, nutritious beef to California consumers…

“Prop. 15 will devastate farmers and ranchers by increasing property taxes on agricultural buildings and improvements, including basically everything that is required to move food from farm to fork. Structures like barns and feedlots will be heavily taxed; even fruit trees and grape vines will be subject to higher property taxes.

“The result is that families throughout California will pay more for meat, cheese, eggs, produce and virtually every other agricultural product at a time when many can least afford it.

“Proposition 15 will even increase property taxes on solar panels and methane digesters, effectively punishing farmers and ranchers for proactively undertaking responsible environmental stewardship…

“California ranchers and farmers could lose as much as $8.6 billion in 2020, according to a study by the California Farm Bureau Federation…

“The prospect of eliminating agriculture’s Prop 13-guaranteed tax protections could not come at a worse time. Prop 15, unless defeated, will be the final blow to many ranchers, farmers and our employees.”

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.

ICYMI: Santa Cruz Sentinel Joins 20+ Newspapers Across California Opposing Prop 15

SACRAMENTO, CA – The Santa Cruz Sentinel is the latest newspaper to editorialize against Proposition 15—the largest property tax increase in state history. Citing concerns about raising taxes on small businesses and increase costs for consumers, the Santa Cruz Sentinel joins more than two dozen newspapers across California in opposition to Prop 15.

Read excerpts from the Santa Cruz Sentinel’s Prop. 15 would increase burden on small businesses” below:

“If approved by voters, it would mark the first real revision to 1978’s landmark Proposition 13 that reset property taxes to the purchase price of home or business and also capped at 2% how much government could annually increase the tax…

“But a tax on big businesses will in many cases just result in property owners passing along the increase to small businesses that lease or rent their space. To say the very least, this would create a new burden on small businesses that are already reeling from the economic effects of the pandemic. 

“Another consequence: Businesses likely would also pass along the increase to consumers in the form of higher prices…

“Prop. 13, however, has remained popular with voters and as former Gov. Jerry Brown, who was leading the state when the measure passed, learned, trying to overturn it was a political loser…

“And it’s the wrong time for another tax hike. Vote no on Proposition 15.”

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.

PROP 15 WILL TAKE MONEY FROM POORER, RURAL COUNTIES AND RAISE PROPERTY TAXES ON RURAL HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS

Controversial tax measure will create winners and losers, exacerbate regional inequality, and raise property tax rates on rural homeowners 

SACRAMENTO, CA – Unless defeated by voters in November, Proposition 15 will, for the first time in state history, force counties to send their property tax revenue to Sacramento politicians who, in turn, will redistribute tax dollars across the state. However, thanks to yet another flaw in Prop 15, more than half of California counties could end up losing money for vital services like fire protection and health care at a time when they can least afford it.

“When we began researching the measure, it became clear to many of us is that several California counties would lose tax revenues under Prop 15, which is totally unacceptable,” said Daron McDaniel, chair of the Rural County Representatives of California and Merced County Supervisor. “Even worse, based on the proponents’ own analysis, homeowners and renters who live in counties that lose money under this measure will see their property taxes increase. Prop 15 will raise costs for our communities and residents at a time when we are all suffering from the worst economic crisis in generations.”

Even the proponents’ own website acknowledges the existence of loser counties if Prop 15 passes. In fact, in their “How Your County Will Benefit” section, only 28 of the state’s 58 counties are listed, fewer than half of California’s total counties. Here are the 30 counties omitted from the proponents’ website that may lose money and whose homeowners and renters will see an increase in property taxes if Prop 15 passes:

1.  Alpine
2.  Amador
3.  Calaveras
4.  Colusa
5.  Del Norte
6.  Glenn
7.  Humboldt
8.  Imperial
9.  Inyo
10. Kings
11. Lake
12. Lassen
13. Madera
14. Mariposa
15. Mendocino
16. Modoc
17. Mono
18. Napa
19. Nevada
20. Plumas
21. San Benito
22. Shasta
23. Sierra
24. Siskiyou
25. Sutter
26. Tehama
27. Trinity
28. Tuolumne
29. Yolo
30. Yuba

In addition, the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst agreed that some counties may lose money under Prop 15. In the “Fiscal Effect” analysis of Prop 15, they write, “Not all governments would be guaranteed new money. Some in rural areas may end up losing money because of lower taxes on business equipment.” 

review of current tax data shows just how devastating this revenue loss could be for the state’s rural communities. Stanislaus and Imperial counties both stand to lose more than an estimated $2 million annually, and counties including Shasta, Butte and Kings will all lose more than $1 million if the measure captures the low end of its projected revenue. In all, the vast majority of rural counties would lose revenues, siphoning off much needed resources that should be going to hospitals and first responders grappling with COVID-19 and historic wildfires across many rural counties.

Adding insult to injury, homeowners and renters in these losing counties can also expect their property tax burden to rise according to Prop 15’s proponents. Using the proponents’ own arguments, as the business tax base required to support current local bond debt is reduced from the measure’s business personal property tax exemption, homeowners and renters will have to make up the costs through their property taxes. The result will be rural homeowners and renters paying even higher property and housing costs.

“Prop 15 creates winners and losers,” said Senator Cathleen Galgiani (D-Stockton). “Rural California is already suffering and we literally cannot afford to lose money under Prop 15’s series of growing flaws. We are fighting fires, trying to ensure healthcare access in rural communities and some of our residents still don’t have safe drinking water. The last thing our residents need to worry about is higher property taxes and higher costs. Prop 15 will only make regional inequality even worse at a time when we can least afford it.”

###

ABOUT NO ON PROP 15 – STOP HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES AND SAVE PROP 13
No on Prop 15 – Stop Higher Property Taxes and Save Prop 13, a bipartisan coalition of homeowners, taxpayers, and businesses, has been fighting to protect Prop 13 and oppose a split-roll property tax for more than a decade. For more information, please visit www.NOonProp15.org.